Al-Masakin News Agency

Independent Media

State Department calls Durban Declaration and Program of Action (DDPA) “unsalvageable”

almasakinMissoula, March 1 (Al-Masakin)–The U.S. State Department said in a press release on Friday that the United States will not participate in the upcoming Durban Review Conference to be held April  20-24 in Geneva calling it “unsalvageable” because the document of the organization singles out Israel and calls for reparations for slavery.

“The document being negotiated has gone from bad to worse, and the current text of the draft outcome document is not salvageable. As a result, the United States will not engage in further negotiations on this text, nor will we participate in a conference based on this text. A conference based on this text would be a missed opportunity to speak clearly about the persistent problem of racism,” Acting State Department Spokeman Robert Wood said in a press release Feb. 27.

“The U.S. believes any viable text for the Review Conference must be shortened and not reaffirm in toto the flawed 2001 Durban Declaration and Program of Action (DDPA). It must not single out any one country or conflict, nor embrace the troubling concept of “defamation of religion.” The U.S. also believes an acceptable document should not go further than the DDPA on the issue of reparations for slavery.”

 

The Durban Conference is a follow-up to the 2001 UN World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance (WCAR). The UNCHR is responsible for organizing and convening the event.

 

The statement to the press went on to say that the United States found the trajectory of UNHRC’s Universal Periodic Review “disturbing” and would therefore participate in the next round of UPRs May 4-15 as an observe only because of its criticism for Israel which the State Department finds “unbalanced.”

 

“We share the concerns of many that the Council’s trajectory is disturbing, that it needs fundamental change to do more to promote and protect the human rights of people around the world, and that it should end its repeated and unbalanced criticisms of Israel.”

 

EHC / EHC

March 2, 2009 Posted by | 2001 Durban Declaration and Program of Action (DDPA), Al-Masakin, and Related Intolerance (WCAR), Durban Review Conference, Geneva, Israel, Palestine, Racial Discrimination, Robert Wood, Slavery, State Department, UN World Conference against Racism, UNHRC, Universal Periodic Review, USA, Xenophobia | Comments Off

UNHRC concludes 4th session, UPRs to begin May 4-15

almasakin

Missoula, Feb. 17 (Al-Masakin)–The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) concluded its fourth session of its first cycle Feb. 13.  The two week session which began Feb. 2 reviewed the human rights records for sixteen states:  Germany, Djibouti, Canada, Bangladesh, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, China, Nigeria, Mexico, Mauritius, Jordan and Malaysia. 

The UNHRC’s Universal Periodic Review is scheduled to begin its fifth session May 4-15.  The next sixteen states to be reviewed will be: Central African Republic, Monaco, Belize, Chad, Congo, Malta, New Zealand, Afghanistan, Chile, Viet Nam, Uruguay, Yemen, Vanuatu, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Comoros and Slovakia.

The review process which began in 2008 has reviewed the human rights records for 64 states. The review is one-third completed for the United Nations 192 member states.  The UNHRC’s first cycle will be completed in 2011.

EHC / EHC

February 17, 2009 Posted by | Al-Masakin, UNHRC, United Nations, Universal Periodic Review | Comments Off

Amnesty International claims report of Mexican government to the UNHRC’s UPR does not reflect the reality on the ground

amnesty-international

Mexican government’s report to UN fails to acknowledge human rights reality

Police officers have not yet been brought to justice for human rights violations during demonstrations in Oaxaca in 2006

 

Police officers have not yet been brought to justice for human rights violations during demonstrations in Oaxaca in 2006

© Uta Rossberg

9 February 2009

A Mexican government report about the state of human rights in the country does not reflect the reality on the ground, according to Amnesty International.

Submitted to the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council, the report fails to acknowledge the frequent lack of implementation or impact of the Mexican government’s policies. It also fails to acknowledge the worsening human rights climate in many parts of the country.

Mexico is one of 16 countries up for review at the fourth session of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group of the UN Human Rights Council, which started in Geneva on 2 February. Mexico’s review is scheduled for Tuesday.

“The government report’s list of positive initiatives and reforms is good news,” said Kerrie Howard, Americas Deputy Director at Amnesty International. “The problem is there is no information on progress in preventing continuing human rights violations and ending impunity.”

Amnesty International has contributed a series of alternative reports to the current round of reviews detailing key human rights concerns in 12 of the 16 countries that are up for review. The organization’s report on Mexico noted that:

  • Mexico has so far failed to explicitly recognize the status of international human rights treaties in its Constitution.
  • The authorities have yet to hold anyone to account for the 100 killings and 700 enforced disappearances that took place between the 1960s and 1980s.
  • Mexican federal, state and municipal police officers implicated in serious human rights violations, such as arbitrary detention, torture, rape and unlawful killings, particularly those committed during civil disturbances in San Salvador Atenco and Oaxaca City in 2006, have not been brought to justice.
  • The military justice system continues to try cases of human rights violations despite international human rights standards insisting these should be tried in civilian courts.
  • The number of reports of abuses such as arbitrary detention, torture and other ill-treatment, sexual violence and unlawful killings by security officials has increased during security operations to combat violent criminal gangs.
  • Human rights defenders, particular those in rural areas, often face persecution and sometimes prolonged detention on the basis of fabricated or politically-motivated criminal charges.
  • Indigenous and other marginalized communities sometimes face harassment for opposing development projects affecting their livelihoods.
  • Irregular migrants in transit in Mexico routinely face ill-treatment by state officials as well as sexual and other violence at the hands of criminal gangs.
  • Despite advances in legislation to protect women from violence, implementation is weak. Reporting, prosecution and conviction rates for those responsible for domestic violence, rape and even killings of women remain extremely low. Two years after the adoption of the 2007 General Law to prevent violence against women, two states have not even introduced legislation to enforce it.
  • Poverty and marginalization continue to deprive many rural communities, particularly indigenous peoples, of the right to an adequate standard of living and the right to development, in accordance with their own needs and interests.

“Amnesty International recognizes that Mexico’s report highlights the open invitation to international human rights mechanisms,” said Kerry Howard. “And given the country’s key role in the design of the Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council, the organization hopes the government will use this as an opportunity to reinvigorate its efforts to address human rights problems in Mexico.”

The UPR is the first-ever UN mechanism to look systematically at the human rights records of all 192 UN member states. From 2008-2011, 48 countries will be reviewed each year, 16 in each of the UPR Working Group’s three annual sessions.

Governments scheduled for examination by the Human Rights Council this month include China, Cuba, Germany, Nigeria, the Russian Federation, and Saudi Arabia. The current UPR session is scheduled to run until 13 February.

Read More

Universal Periodic Review 2009
UN review must deliver on human rights (News, 3 February 2009)

February 9, 2009 Posted by | Amnesty International (AI), Mexico, UNHRC, United Nations, Universal Periodic Review | Comments Off

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.